Climate Mayors, C40 Cities, USDN and City-Led Organizations Submit Letter to EPA with Recommendations to Ensure U.S. Cities Can Maximize the Benefits of Climate Pollution Reduction Grants
On behalf of our organizations that support climate action at the local level, we are pleased to submit these comments on the design and implementation of the newly created Climate Pollution Reduction Fund Program. The $5 billion available for planning and implementation of actions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the state and local level could provide much needed capacity to accelerate transformative climate action and fill gaps in other new and existing funding programs. Critically, the program can build on the success and lessons learned from the many local governments that have created and are now implementing innovative climate action plans that advance both climate and equity goals.
We urge the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to consider the following cross-cutting principles in implementing the Climate Pollution Reduction Grant program and provide specific recommendations for each of the types of funding available for planning, implementation and technical assistance:
Cross Cutting Principles: For the program to deliver ambitious climate action, it is essential EPA recognize the crucial role of local governments in state and regional planning and implementation. To the greatest extent possible, we strongly urge the Agency to provide funding directly to local governments who are well-positioned to engage with communities and residents and have an acute understanding of how climate action can deliver health, economic, and other co-benefits at the community-level.
Planning Grants ($250M): The program must recognize the extent to which many state and local governments have already adopted climate action plans. Inclusive climate action plans can often take a year or more to complete and require significant allocation of limited resources, time, and staff capacity.
Implementation Grants (~$4.75B): EPA should prioritize implementation funding to jumpstart the most promising strategies, including those at the local and regional level, that can deliver rapid emissions reductions and benefits to disadvantaged communities and those on the frontlines of climate change. EPA should also maximize the broad and flexible nature of the program compared to other sources of federal funding.
Administrative Funding (up to $142M): Technical assistance should provide eligible entities, especially those that otherwise wouldn’t have the capacity or means to develop plans on their own, support to develop and implement comprehensive climate action plans that embed multiple additional environmental, health, equity, economic and societal benefits.
Read the full letter and recommendations therein HERE.
Signed,
Climate Mayors
C40 Cities
National League of Cities
Southeast Sustainability Directors Network
The U.S. Conference of Mayors
Urban Sustainability Directors Network